Dealer fined after knowingly selling unroadworthy car

Trader persuaded buyer to arrange MOT despite advert stating 12-months MOT - buyer didn't know about long list of fails

Dealer fined after knowingly selling unroadworthy car

A used car dealer has been fined after knowingly selling an unroadworthy vehicle.

Armin Hajizadeh, trading as Classic Motor Show from a premises in Gateshead, has been found guilty at South Tyneside Magistrate’s Court of seven offences relating to the sale of a car he knew to be in a unroadworthy condition.

In November 2021, the trader advertised a Hyundai Coupe with a ’12-month MOT’ on AutoTrader for £1,500.

However, when a consumer contacted the seller she was told the car had not yet passed an MOT, and that she could buy it for £1,200 if she arranged the test herself, and could have her money back if the car failed.

What she was not told was that the car had failed an MOT that same morning.

Related: Mechanic admits handling stolen goods to fix accident-damaged cars

When the car failed a further MOT, paid for by the consumer, Hajizadeh refused to refund her, stating instead that he sold the car for ‘spares or repair’, which he had written on his invoice.

A Trading Standards investigation discovered that Hadjizadeh had purchased the car at an auction for just £284.

A DVSA inspection confirmed that the MOT failures were due to a heavily corroded suspension, an inoperative parking brake, and a major leak of exhaust gasses due to a fractured exhaust pipe.

Hadjizadeh was found guilty under the Road Traffic Act of selling a car in an unroadworthy condition.

Related: Mechanic’s stolen van found in field with £40k worth of tools missing

He was also found guilty under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations for providing misleading information by stating the car had a valid MOT in an advert, for not advising the consumer the car had failed an MOT, telling her she could have a refund if the car failed an MOT, for stating that the car was sold for salvage or repair when this was not the case, and for obstructing a Trading Standards Officer by not producing documents when requested.

For not having his name and business details on the invoice given to the consumer, he was also found guilty under the Companies Act.

Hadjizadeh was ordered to pay a £500 fine, a £50 victim surcharge, and £1,074 in costs.

He was also instructed to fully refund the consumer, plus any costs incurred during the time she had possession of the vehicle.

Related: Used car part thefts rife, insurance data shows

Councillor Linda Green, Cabinet Member for Communities and Volunteering at Gateshead Council, said: “We are absolutely delighted with the outcome of this prosecution.

“The unscrupulous sale of unsafe vehicles not only presents a risk to life to those in the car, but also to anyone who may find themselves in its path should it suffer a catastrophic failure in movement.

“The requirement for an MOT means cars such as the one sold by Mr Hadjizadah should not be driving on our roads, and the fact it was sold deceitfully to an unsuspecting consumer, followed by a pack of lies to avoid having to provide a refund, is appalling.

“The results of this prosecution should serve as a warning to any other traders out there who think they can deal in fraudulent goods or services.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

Have your say!

0 0

Lost Password

Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.